30 October, 2006

C is for Cinema

Mood: Indifferent
Currently listening to: Phantom Planet - One Ray of Sunlight

The film industry is the second largest of the modern day communication mediums. In the non-American world, Bollywood reigns supreme as the highest producer of cinematic features, generating gross earnings of nearly $160 billion USD a year (Actuarys and Statisticians Institute of Australia, 2005). With the wide spectrum of genres, there is almost certainly a film that will appeal to everyone. Whether it be comedy or romance or drama that pleases you, the movie market has grown so much over the past decade (Film Actor's Guild, 2004), that anyone, young or old, Asian or not, can enjoy a great cinema exprience.

The death of the VCR and the advent of the DVD was considered the greatest boon for the film industry for the last twenty years. Resident evil journalist Sharles Dubyoo recently interviewed movie director Steven Spielbergo to gain some insight regarding the effects that the birth of the DVD format has had on filmmaking. Mr Spielbergo had absolutely no knowledge or opinion regarding this area, and it was only revealed over a cup of coffee several hours after the interview that Mr Spielbergo was actually a fictional character spoof by Matt Groening, the creator of popular animated series: The Simpsons and Futurama (Wikipedia, Date of article unknown).

With the number of directors in the industry, new films are released at a fast rate and usually stay onscreen for an average of 2 months. There are exceptions however, such as the geek-flick trilogy of The Lord of the Rings, and teenybopper favourites like the Harry Potter film series which managed to stay in cinema for a disgusting 16 and 14 weeks respectively (ASIA, 2004). Many of our readers have written in to express their opinion regarding chick-flick Step Up. One reader felt that this movie had been onscreen for too long and also provided a published study detailing the correlation between film rating and endurance. The letter C assured readers that although Step Up was still showing at cinemas, nobody was going to go watch that trash.

On a tangent to the previous paragraph, in an attempt to increase readership, the pop culture column editor at the letter C paid an undisclosed amount of Internet currency to a source which we have only identified as a misinformed schoolboy for a list of films to see this summer. This is the list that was retrieved:


Films to see, Summer of 2006:
Jackass Number Two
Borat movie
Children of Men

*UPDATE: The schoolboy, with the screenname "CWang" sent us an email denouncing our tasteless satire and has urged us to see all the films on the list this summer.

26 October, 2006

C is for Chancellery

Mood: Oblivious
Currently listening to: Hinder - Lips of an Angel

THE LETTER C
SEAL OF FINE JOURNALISM

24 October, 2006

C is for Charles

Mood: Calm under pressure
Currently listening to: Fort Minor - Where'd You Go

Welcome to the newest evelight/skyless/husht. Husht unfortunately died pretty soon after I renounced Photoshop. I have been tempted to get it back, but am still holding well against my kleptomania. This new blog is currently operating under the working title: "the letter C". I find myself still saving my images in the \husht\ folder under \charles\. Simply as an act of conformity, I'll continue doing this until the end of the school year. How this is relevant to you, my reader, is completely oblivious to me. My hypothesis is that this behaviour is a symptom of "blogger-syndrome" (Wong, 2006), where we (bloggers) feel the unfathomable instinct to unnecessarily express ourselves. It's slightly weirded out, I know. I am moreso frightened at the fact that I presented a hypothesis.

Some dear friends of mine are MSN Spacers, LiveJournalists, and (yes, I am not kidding) BlogSpiriters (i lol'd). Now, for one, I've totally gotten over the fancy artsy layout factor. Layout is not what makes a great blog. While the aesthetics are important and also provide a more comfortable read for my demographic, those who know me (artistically speaking) will empathise with my liking to minimalist designs. Come on, I am Charles Wong, the guy who is most likely to do anything, and nothing. It's either conservative or radical. I can't be the inbetween. I don't know how. I claimed this many years ago and it would appear to still be true this very day. Now I mentioned these other blog-service-providers (BSPs?) because I want to see a flamewar happening. I also just went back to the start of my post and started bolding random stuff.

My hypothesis is that this behaviour is a symptom of
"blogger-syndrome" (Wong, 2006), where we (bloggers) feel the
unfathomable instinct to unnecessarily express ourselves.

Well, (probably inproper use of a new paragraph) see, I'm a Blogger (yes, literally) because I have a slight amount of discrimination for the other BSPs. MSN Spaces were great, until Microsoft decided to "revamp" the scheme of the interface. Now it's plain retarded. The only good thing about MSN Spaces was the embedded photo album. Nobody can disagree on that. But even then, the photo album feature went downhill when they removed slideshow navigation. Now it's plain junk. Writing a post in MSN Spaces also causes it to lag like you're playing 5 instances of DOTA on highest video quality in the background. I am not kidding. This is the very reason I deserted my Space and came here.

LiveJournal is not so bad, other than the fact I have no idea what's going on when I write in it. My good friend Emily keeps a very clean and tidy blog on LJ, hats off to her. Gotta love the mood emoticons. They own. I think they wouldn't let me use any of my common passwords, not even with numbers or whatever. I simply couldn't be bothered remembering an extra password to keep a blog that maybe 5 people at maximum will read. And BlogSpirit just sounds retarded. K? I have no idea how this information is going to affect you. I don't think it will, and I also think I just wasted some valuable minutes of my life typing this junk.

At last, we can have a little section regarding the post title. Yes, that's right, C is for Charles and nothing else. No, not even for chocolate or cheesecake or China. Just for today, the letter C stands for nothing else. As a bonus kickstart to my new blog, check out this Mii (Nintendo Wii Avatar o_O) of me (this "me" of me, haha):

For avatar-whoring enthusiasts, you can make your own at http://www.joystiq.com/media/2006/10/mii.swf

*EDIT: After previewing the republished version of my blog with this post in full, I officially declare that I sound like an intelligent and well-informed teenybopper. This is a great day for the Socialite World Order (Wong, 2006) and a terrible day for fine journalism.